Elizabeth. (1985)patibility inside the mother or father-child relationships: Root and processes

Elizabeth. (1985)patibility inside the mother or father-child relationships: Root and processes

Mutton, Meters. E., & Gilbride, K. In the W. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and you will in conflict dating (pp. 33-60). Nyc: Springer-Verlag. [ Links ]

Lee, L., Loewenstein, Grams., Ariely, D., Hong, J., & Young, J. (2008). When the I am not saying hot, have you been gorgeous or not?: Physical-appeal recommendations and you may relationships preferences because the a function of an individual’s own attractiveness.

Psychological Research, 19, 669677. [ Links ]

Levinger, Grams., & Rands, Yards. (1985)patibility in-marriage or any other romantic relationship. Inside the W. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and incompatible relationships (pp. 309-331). Ny: Springer-Verlag. [ Backlinks ]

Lewin, K., Dembo, T., Festinger, L., & Sears, P. (1944). Amount of ambition. During the J. McV. Take a look (Ed.), Identity together with conclusion disorders (Vol. step 1, pp. 333378). New york: Ronald Force. [ Website links ]

Enjoying, T. J. (2006). Predicting matchmaking relationship future that have insiders’ and outsiders’ angle: Who and you may what exactly is expected things. Personal Matchmaking, 13, 349-362. [ Website links ]

Luo, S., & Klohnen, Elizabeth. C. (2005). Assortative mating and you will marital quality during the newly wedded couples: A couple established means. Record of Identity and Personal Therapy, 88, 304-326. [ Hyperlinks ]

Lutz-Zois, C. J., Bradley, Good. C., Mihalik, J. L., & Moorman-Eavers, Age. R. (2006). Thought of similarity and you can relationships triumph certainly one of relationships lovers: An enthusiastic idiographic strategy. [ Links ]

Madden, Yards., & Lenhart, A beneficial. (2006). Dating. Washington, DC: Declaration toward Pew Websites & American Existence Venture. Recovered , out of [ Website links ]

MacDonald, T. K., & Ross, Meters. (1999). Evaluating the accuracy out of predictions about relationships relationship: Just how and just why do lovers’ predictions range from the individuals produced by perceiver? kissbrides.com Related Site Character and you will Public Therapy Bulletin, twenty-five, 14171429. [ Links ]

ater, J., & Smith, S. (1982). Legitimizing products throughout the initiation off heterosexual dating. Papers showed within Very first Global Conference on Personal Relationships, Madison, WI. [ Hyperlinks ]

Journal of Personal and personal Matchmaking, 23, 865-880

Montoya, Roentgen. M., Horton, R. S., & Kirchner, J. (2008). Is real resemblance important for destination? A good meta-studies regarding real and you can sensed resemblance. Record from Societal and private Dating, 25, 889-922. [ Backlinks ]

Digital relationship and virtual associated: Conceptualizing computer mediated romantic relationships

Morry, M. M. (2005). Relationship pleasure as the good predictor from similarity critiques; A test of your own destination-similarity theory. Diary out of Public and personal Relationships, twenty-two, 561-584. [ Website links ]

Morry, Meters. Meters. (2007). The fresh appeal-resemblance hypothesis certainly cross-sex nearest and dearest: Dating fulfillment, recognized similarities, and you can worry about-helping attitudes. Diary of Societal and private Relationships, twenty four, 117-138. [ Backlinks ]

Murstein, B. We. (1987). An explanation and expansion of one’s SVR theory of dyadic pairing. Log from ily, 49, 929-947. [ Website links ]

Orbuch, T. L., Veroff, J. Hassan, H., & Horrocks, J. (2002). That will separation: An excellent 14-12 months longitudinal examination of black lovers and white couples. Diary from Societal and private Dating, 19, 179-202. [ Links ]

Orenstein, S. (). The latest love formula Fits believes it’s discovered a formula having governing the net relationships team: A technical way to find Mr. otherwise Ms. Right. Team dos.0 Magazine. Retrieved towards the off [ Hyperlinks ]

Rammstedt, B., & Schupp, J. (2008). Just the congruent endure – Personality similarities in partners. Character and you will Individual Differences, forty five, 533-535. [ Links ]

Regan, P. C., Levin, L., Sprecher, S., Christopher, S., & Cate, Roentgen. (2000). Mate needs: Exactly what attributes create everyone focus within their small-name intimate and long-name personal lovers? Record out-of Mindset and you will Person Sex, several, 1-21. [ Website links ]

Reis, H. T. (1985). The brand new role of one’s worry about from the initiation and you will span of public telecommunications. From inside the W. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and incompatible relationship (pp. 209-231). Ny: Sprinter-Verlag. [ Links ]

Click to rate this post!
[Total: 0 Average: 0]

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

All Categories